Book a demo
Feedback
Overview
Analysis
Eleven Labs vs Play (streaming) preference (business)
Preference between 2.5 Turbo and PlayDialog (single speaker, business conversations, streaming, v01.08.24)
Loading...
Loading...
Question 1. Listen to the speech/audio samples and rate which one you prefer.
Comparison | 5 steps
Overall
Play (Model B)
-0.37
Turbo 2.5 (Model A)
Answers
2
.
Turbo 2.5 (Model A)
is better
1
0
-1
-2
.
Play (Model B)
is better
76 (25.33%)
27 (9.00%)
27 (9.00%)
51 (17.00%)
119 (39.67%)
Deep analysis
Distribution
Mean
Files
2
.
Turbo 2.5 (Model A)
is better
1
0
-1
-2
.
Play (Model B)
is better
MAX 2
1
0
-1
MIN -2
MAX 2
1
0
-1
MIN -2
Tags
Filename
Model
Tags
Statistics
x̅
CI
σ
x̅
00:00
--:--
30.wav
00:00
--:--
30.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
x̅
-0.40
CI
1.13
σ
x̅
0.50
00:00
--:--
31.wav
00:00
--:--
31.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
x̅
-1.10
CI
1.04
σ
x̅
0.46
00:00
--:--
32.wav
00:00
--:--
32.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
x̅
-0.90
CI
1.19
σ
x̅
0.53
00:00
--:--
33.wav
00:00
--:--
33.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
x̅
-1.00
CI
1.22
σ
x̅
0.54
00:00
--:--
34.wav
00:00
--:--
34.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
x̅
0.10
CI
1.33
σ
x̅
0.59
00:00
--:--
35.wav
00:00
--:--
35.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
x̅
-1.20
CI
0.88
σ
x̅
0.39
00:00
--:--
36.wav
00:00
--:--
36.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
x̅
-1.20
CI
0.94
σ
x̅
0.42
00:00
--:--
37.wav
00:00
--:--
37.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
x̅
-0.50
CI
1.13
σ
x̅
0.50
1
2
3
4
Question 2. What was the main factor behind your preferred sample?
Single select | No-scored | 5 radio buttons
Answers
A1. Expressiveness
A2. Audio quality
A3. Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
A4. Voice accuracy (e.g. pronunciation)
A5. Hallucinations
A6. Other...
68 (22.67%)
74 (24.67%)
116 (38.67%)
35 (11.67%)
1 (0.33%)
6 (2.00%)
Deep analysis
Distribution
Files
A1. Expressiveness
A2. Audio quality
A3. Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
A4. Voice accuracy (e.g. pronunciation)
A5. Hallucinations
A6. Other...
Tags
Answers
Expressiveness
Audio quality
Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
Voice accuracy (e.g. pronunciation)
Hallucinations
Other...
Filename
Model
Tags
00:00
--:--
30.wav
00:00
--:--
30.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
Audio quality
Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
Voice accuracy (e.g. pronunciation)
2 more...
00:00
--:--
31.wav
00:00
--:--
31.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
Voice accuracy (e.g. pronunciation)
Expressiveness
1 more...
00:00
--:--
32.wav
00:00
--:--
32.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
Audio quality
Expressiveness
Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
00:00
--:--
33.wav
00:00
--:--
33.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
Expressiveness
Audio quality
2 more...
00:00
--:--
34.wav
00:00
--:--
34.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
Voice accuracy (e.g. pronunciation)
Audio quality
Same as the first evaluation, the expressiveness makes A feel better to listen to but it's distorted in some parts.
00:00
--:--
35.wav
00:00
--:--
35.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
Audio quality
Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
Expressiveness
00:00
--:--
36.wav
00:00
--:--
36.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
Expressiveness
Audio quality
Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
00:00
--:--
37.wav
00:00
--:--
37.wav
Turbo 2.5
Play
Audio quality
Pacing (e.g. rhythm, tempo, speed)
Expressiveness
1 more...
1
2
3
4
